675.cc • Triumph 675 Forum
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

NSFW: for the serious music lover

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by glue, Dec 17, 2009.

  1. glue

    glue

    Thread Starter

    26
    0
    0
    Location: Port St.Mary
  2. D41

    D41

    13,993
    144
    63
    Location: Orange, CA
    Re: for the serious music lover

    Did I just accidentally log onto the wrong forum by mistake...?





    Nope.com!!
     
  3. henrymc

    henrymc

    794
    0
    0
    Location: lincoln
    Re: for the serious music lover

    Not sure what the site moderators will make of this one, will have to wait and see :erm:
     
  4. Craig

    Craig Administrator Staff Member

    4,881
    224
    63
    Location: Maidstone
    Interesting take on a video :roll: defiantly off topic :p

    (moved and tagged the thread, I'm keen on trying to provide an uncensored environment but maybe something like this would need a new forum completely so it's not tangled with content members may view in an appropriate environment. Any suggestions to how you would like to view this content - viewable or not at all on this site, please comment on the comments forum and I'll sway to the direction of the members views and opinions)
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I can’t see the clip as my bandwidth in work is pants but I do have a suggestion on the filtering side or things...
    Ban text talk for a start as if you cannot string a sentence together then you really shouldn’t be writing on forums. Next one is having a filter in place to replace ‘Awesome’ with nice or really nice as awesome is so overused for mediocre content… I won’t even get into the word ‘gonna’ :?

    Tangent over :)
     
  6. Liked the song but cant see MTV or any other for that matter let that one be broadcast before the watershed!!!

    :twisted: :lol: :twisted:
     
  7. Not a prude, but don't really know why this thread is relevant on here :?:
    I also realise it's mostly guys on here, so I guess I'll be overuled :roll:
    But just letting you know my feelings on it :|
     
  8. crj

    crj

    214
    0
    0
    Location: Staffs
    I think the 'content' of the thread on here isn't relevant but, the discussion about this 'form' of thread is. Does that make sense?

    Other than that I agree with Moonwitch, even if I'm not entirely comfortable with her generalisation on males
     
  9. I love you guys...and I'm not meaning to offend anyone, but the content is quite orientated to blokes (not all blokes for sure, and may interest some girls too), that's all I was saying... :?
     
  10. Not sure what that was all about! thought we were a group of people who were into our 675.
     
  11. Too true jules too true..
     
  12. With you on that one :|
     
  13. D41

    D41

    13,993
    144
    63
    Location: Orange, CA
    Well, to be fair to "glue" it IS posted in "Off Topic" & he definitely gave us fair warning that there were some graphic scenes in the clip. I personally wasn't offended by it, even found it a bit interesting TBH, but my concern would be that threads of this nature don't get out of hand, as that would probably 'sour' me on this site to some extent.


    Says who? - Not really up to you, as acronyms such as TBH, PMSL, LOL, etc. are easier to type than the "long" version, & almost universally accepted as being part of the English-speaking world's lexicon. Do we also start banning members that are perhaps not great spellers, also...?

    Ah, it's an American slang word for "going to", much like "learnt" is English slang for "learned"...and I'm gonna use it as much as I like - 'cos it's AWESOME..don't u think so, m8????
     
  14. Hey 'overseas'...are you the Vocabulary Police??? :lol:
     
  15. D41

    D41

    13,993
    144
    63
    Location: Orange, CA
    :lol1: :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

    ...."Ve haff veys off makings you talk!!"
     
  16. henrymc

    henrymc

    794
    0
    0
    Location: lincoln
    I posted this in comments and suggestions earlier this evening, on this subject,
    I thought I would repost it here and add that the more I think on the subject the more I think that posts like this should not be on the forum, before anyone mistakenly thinks that I am a narrow minded prude, sorry that is far from the case, This is a bike forum and that is not ART.



    Re: NSFW Content

    Postby henrymc » Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:06 pm
    I think that the girls on the forum should be considered.
    I am not against it but at the end of the day we are a bike forum and not a porn forum, while this is supposed to be a music video :?: (without the video the record would sell Fook all copy's) IMHO it was done to create controversy and make money for the record company and the band through this, it is from a film that even today would not get aired on mainstream TV. plus where do you draw the line on post content :erm:
    Keep her lit

    henrymc
     
  17. Henry...
    You are wise and very fair... :)
    I salute you :salute:
    Di x
     
  18. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Sort of but how long can the ‘seen a 675 here ‘n’ there' thread go on for? (truth be told, I simply don’t understand professing that you have seen a 675 dashing about)
     
  19. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Learnt isn’t slang, it’s an irregular verb!

    No one mentioned banning people but if that’s your Interpretation, that’s ok as it’s a free world after all isn’t it???? :roll:
     
  20. If you have seen a 675 on the road and it's posted on the site, and you have seen it in your are area, you never know it might be someone from this site that you know by user name but not by face. Or if your out on a rideout, may be chatting to fellow 675 riders you can give then the link to 675.cc. :D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. By using this website you agree to our Cookies usage. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, ads and Newsletters:
    Dismiss Notice